The Effects of Doublethink
Late into Part 2, Winston begins reading Emmanuel Goldstein's book, "The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism". The book discusses Doublethink, which the book defines as accepting two contradictory facts as true at the same time. This is an insane concept to think about, and seems almost impossible in real life, but the effects of it are great. It perfectly solves all of the problems the Party might've had of keeping the members of the Party in line. The members of the Inner Party who may be perpetuating the war both know the war cannot end and are fervent supporters of the Party's victory in the war. This does mean that the people who use doublethink can't think too deeply into things and form their own conclusions as that destroys the principles of doublethink. While the party doesn't care about this "minor" side-effect, this could have major ramifications for anyone who uses the concept of doublethink in our times. Although it might be much less common, I'm sure people nowadays use this concept as well, although I can't think of any specific examples. Are there any examples you can think of?
I think that despite us not having the word "doublethink" commonly used in everyday society, there are some novice examples of it being used to some degree. Climate change deniers, for instance, have to not only disagree with science (ie actual facts), but then also have to choose whether to actually acknowledge the changing temperatures. Either way, I believe those people are engaging in some form of "doublethink".
ReplyDeleteI think there's a LOT of doublethink out there. One quick example: people who demand that everyone stand for the National Anthem are doublethinking when they say that we must all respect the freedom this country stands for. Erm, doesn't that include freedom to peacefully dissent?
ReplyDelete